Natures Corner's blog: "Nature's Corner Newsletter"

For women entering menopause who decide to take hormone replacement therapy, (HRT), doctors usually prescribe synthetics.  The most popular is called Pre-mar-in, althought other conjugated estrogens with similar names are used. These estrogens are often called "natural", however, they are not natural to a woman's body.  Medical evidence has demonstrated the increased risks of breast, uterine, ovarian and cervical cancer linked with these widely used "synthetic estrogens".  Premarin and it's equivalent  is big business.  Most women are uninformed and their doctors do not educate them because most women would not think to ask if their HRT comes from a pregnant mare.

Bioidentical hormone therapy, often called "bioidenticals" has been effective at relieving the symptoms of menopause and are a true replacement.  They are designed to be molecularly  "identical" to our body's production of these life sustaining hormones.  Bioidenticals are derived from plant extracts and are obtained from a compounding pharmacy.  Not all doctors are familiar with this type of hormone replacement therapy.  If you choose to use bioidenticals, it is best to find a physician who specializes in this type of protocol.

Many bioidenticals are compounded by pharmacists who blend various ingredients in specific amounts to create just-for-you medications. A compounding pharmacist may also create alternative delivery systems (a cream or lozenge, for instance) to commercial ones. However, some so-called bioidentical hormones are already available in commercial products, including those delivered through a skin patch or gel. Mainstream doctors prescribe these all the time (some common brands include Estrace, Climara, and Prometrium) but won't claim that they have any special powers and may not emphasize that they are bioidentical.

Unlike commercially available products, compounded formulas are not regulated by the FDA. "With an FDA-approved hormone, you know that it has been produced in an FDA-approved facility. And if a drug company gets FDA approval for a drug in capsule form, it has to go through the approval process again before selling the same ingredient in a cream or another form," says Larry Sasich, assistant professor of pharmacy at the Lake Erie College of Medicine, in Pennsylvania. "In many compounded products, we don't know the source of the hormones or how well they work in the form provided. What consumers may be dealing with is a shadow drug industry, one that produces untested products."

Sometimes there's a good reason for compounding: You need a lower dose of testosterone than the one contained in the formula approved for men; you're allergic to the peanut-oil base in a particular product; your doctor wants you to use a lozenge. However, with a compounded formula, there's very little quality assurance -- you can't be sure you're getting the right dose, and you can't know how much of the hormone will enter your bloodstream from the compounded cream, lozenge, gel, or capsule.

But is there really such a thing as a harmless hormone? "Even hormones made by your body can hurt you," says Adriane Fugh-Berman, MD, who teaches in the complementary and alternative medicine program at Georgetown University. "There's lots of data that indicates women with higher natural levels of estrogen are at a higher risk for breast cancer."

Bioidentical hormones have not been studied in clinical trials in the U.S., which frees promoters to claim that, among other things, estriol is not only safe but may prevent cancer because it is weaker than the other estrogens. But any estrogen needs to be taken with caution. For years, oral estriol was prescribed in Europe without the standard progesterone accompaniment to protect against endometrial cancer. Then a study in Sweden revealed that taking one to two milligrams a day of estriol alone doubled the risk of endometrial cancer. In another study in Sweden of 5,000 women, published in February 2006, stronger estrogens increased the risk of ductal and lobular breast cancer. That's really no surprise, but here's what was -- even low-dose oral estriol (about one milligram a day) doubled the risk of lobular breast cancer in women who took it for fewer than five years. "We need more studies, but at this point, we cannot rule out an increased risk for breast cancer even with the less potent estriol," says lead researcher Lena Rosenberg, MD, of the Karolinska Institute, in Stockholm, Sweden.

The role of hormone therapy in the peri- and post menopause is to re-establish the balance that has been lost by the body's bumpy transition from the gently rolling cyclicity of the reproductive years to the lack of estrogen (and frequently testosterone) when the ovaries cease functioning. Many different estrogens, progestogens, combina-tions and delivery systems are available.

In this (usually temporary) replacement, it makes sense to utilize compounds and delivery systems that are best accepted by a woman's body.

A bioidentical is a compound that is biologically identical to that (previously) produced by the body. Also erroneously called "natural hormones", bioidenticals are synthesized in the lab, usually from plant sources (soy beans, wild Mexican yam) to be biologically identical to the hormones secreted from a woman's own ovaries.

Bioidentical hormones include: (1) Estradiol ("E2")--the primary hormone from the ovary. (2) Estrone ("E1")--also secreted from the ovary and to a small degree from adrenal glands; very biologically active. (3) Estriol ("E3")--a byproduct of E1 and E2 metabolism; a weak estrogen. Estriol is not normally secreted from the ovary. (4) Testosterone. (5) Progesterone.

Bioidentical Adrenal Hormones: (1) Pregnenolone. (2) DHEA.

The whole idea of bioidentical hormonal balancing is to re-establish your individual homeostatic hormonal milieu, regain your strength and confidence and then, at your own pace, manage your hormonal taper down all of the way to "taper off", if possible.

A picture is beginning to emerge from all of the confusing results of recent studies. (1) Hormonal therapy is much safer if started at peri-menopause (or early post menopause) rather than many years after menopause. (2) The safest way to administer hormone therapy is to utilize the lowest effective dose of estrogen, giving progestagen (bioidentical progesterone or a mild synthetic) intermittently (if at all), utilizing testosterone in low doses. The testosterone potentiates the action of estrogen and may have (in low doses) an inhibitory effect on cancer-cell proliferation in the breast. Dormant breast tumors that are hormonally sensitive usually have both estrogen and progesterone receptors, so giving both (whether the synthetic or bioidentical) is potentially more dangerous in the long run. (3) After stability is obtained, very slowly, and at the individual's own pace, taper hormone therapy with the goal, after three-seven years, of tapering off all together if tolerated. (4) Some women may wish to continue on low-term hormone therapy. If so, the safest is microdose estrogen, without progesterone, with or without a low dose of testosterone. There probably is an increased risk of breast cancer, but the numbers are extremely small (and estrogen offers bone and colon cancer protection); many women will elect to take this risk because of quality of life factors. IV. Sexual Health: Testosterone, Estrogen, Vaginal Health and Couple's Issues.

It's not just estrogen that's a troublemaker: In June 2006, researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health reported that, after accounting for other common risk factors, postmenopausal women not taking hormones who ranked in the top 20 percent in testosterone levels were at least three times more likely to become diabetic than those naturally low in testosterone. "The research does raise some concerns that testosterone therapy [which is prescribed to boost libido] may possibly increase the risk of diabetes in women," says JoAnn E. Manson, MD, chief of the division of preventive medicine at the Brigham and Women's Hospital, in Boston.

It's a fallacy that if hormones don't come from a pharmaceutical company, then there's no cancer, stroke, or other disease risk associated with them.

The WHI study, whose results scared so many women away from hormone therapy, looked at just one drug, Prempro, a specific combination of oral estrogen and synthetic progestin. Over the past 15 years, information has accumulated establishing the lowest effective doses for treating menopausal symptoms, and many low-dose products and topical formulas (patches, gels, creams) are now on the market.

"We've gone through the same process with menopausal hormones as we did with oral contraceptives," says Wulf Utian, MD, of the North American Menopause Society. "The first birth control pills could have killed an elephant. But the hormones in second-, third- and fourth-generation pills became progressively lower, so now you get only a small fraction of what was in the pills in the early 1960s."

The scientific community is only just beginning to put bioidenticals to the test, but some early results don’t bode well for the so-called “natural” alternative. The findings of the Million Woman Study in 2003 indicated that bioidenticals increased the risk of breast cancer. Another study’s findings released in 2003 reported that bioidenticals did not slow the progression of artherosclerosis.

Alternatives to the Alternatives

Dr. Dale, who has developed her own line of homeopathic treatments for the hormonal fluctuations in the body, says that homeopathy is effective and safe when it comes to treating the symptoms of menopause and perimenopause. She also recommends dietary changes, which, she says, can have an immediate impact. “If a woman eliminates sugar, alcohol and caffeine, it will diminish hot flashes within 24 hours.”

“I felt so much better when I was able to give up caffeine and lay off sugar,” says Pam Myers, 61, of Detroit Lakes, MN, who tried HRT for a year when menopause struck at age 53. After abandoning HRT because of worries about its safety, she tried herbal remedies. “I took black cohosh as an herbal supplement, which helped with hot flashes,” she says.

While the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), a branch of the National Institutes for Health, is currently sponsoring studies of botanicals and herbal supplements as viable treatment options for the symptoms of menopause, very little scientific research has been done on the subject to date. Most testaments to their efficacy—and their possible dangers—are anecdotal. “There are many potential alternatives to estrogen [hormone replacement therapy],” claimed a 2005 conference statement of the NIH’s State of the Science panel convened to review the management of menopause-related symptoms. “However, their effectiveness and long-term safety need to be studied in rigorous clinical trials in diverse populations of women.”

Among today’s most common alternative treatments sought out by women is the herb black cohosh, which some women have used for relief of hot flashes. Ginseng has been said to help with mood swings and insomnia, and the herb kava is reported to reduce anxiety in people of all ages.

A surge of interest in bioidentical hormonal therapy came about because of a book published by actress/self-proclaimed fitness guru, Suzanne Sommers 's , Ageless: Bioidentical Hormones and Beyond. Needless to say, cosmetic/plastic surgery and liposuction have played a large role in her youthful appearance. 

In short, hormones, no matter what their source is, exert very powerful effects on/in the body. The body has a complicated compensatory biofeedback system in which hormones play a major role. Taking external hormonal supplementation will cause the body to make changes to restore previous balances and the end result will still be the same. Symptom improvements most likely, will be temporary. Contact the appropriate healthcare professional familiar with natural/synthetic hormonal replacement.

Should I take it?

Glucomannan is a plant that grows mainly in Asia where it is known as konjac. A closely related species is known as elephant-foot yam due to the exceptionally large tuber (an enlarged underground extension of the plant stem) that it produces. Each glucomannan plant produces one large tuber similar to a beet. Unlike most plants with roots that extend from the bottom of the tuber, glucomannan's roots grow from the top of the tuber, which also puts out one thick stem. Each glucomannan stem in turn, has only one leaf. A single, large, showy, but foul-smelling flower may bloom before the leaf appears. Depending on the species, the leaf may be multi-lobed or single. Glucomannan may be called snake plant because blotchy green, white, yellow, and/or brown markings on the stems resemble snake skin. Tubers, which are usually harvested in the autumn from three-year old plants, can grow up to 10 or more pounds.

Dosage and Administration

Note: Taking glucomannan tablets has been associated with occasional life-threatening blockages of the throat. Individuals who decide to use it should either take capsules and swallow them with plenty of water or use a glucomannan powder that is mixed into fluids before swallowing. Glucomannan should always be taken with 8 ounces or more of water or other fluid.

Common doses used in studies have included:

Summary

Glucomannan, the fiber obtained from the tubers of the konjac plant, is used mainly as a laxative. It may also encourage weight loss, help to lower blood sugar levels, and lessen cholesterol in the blood.

Risks

Individuals with diabetes should not take glucomannan due to possible changes in blood sugar that it may cause. Children under the age of 5 and women who are pregnant or breast-feeding may want to avoid using glucomannan, as well.

Side Effects

In tablet form, glucomannan has been associated with esophageal blockages.

Interactions

Glucomannan's potential decreasing effect on blood sugar may increase the effects of drugs or herbs that also lower blood sugar.

WET CELL APPLIANCE