fubar's blog: "wholesale key"

Windows 7 Office 2010 Only Sales $9.99 ! New Products! New Offers! New Combinations!

May 24, North Korean soldiers in Seoul South Korea - North Korean military demarcation line near the Yang-gun on duty within a post. Outpost set up a tweeter for the DPRK to conduct cross-border propaganda. Xinhua / AFP


Xinhua Pyongyang, May 25 (Xinhua Zhao Yao Simon Development) Committee on the peaceful reunification of Korea 25, a spokesman for a speech in Pyongyang, South Korea announced eight measures, said it would freeze from now on inter-Korean relations, abolition of North Korea Korean non-aggression pact, a full cessation of inter-Korean co-operation.

Central News Agency quoted the spokesman as saying the day, these eight measures include: cut off all ties with the South Korean authorities; in South Korean President Lee Myung-bak in office, cut off all inter-governmental dialogue and engagement; Zhongzhi Panmunjom liaison on behalf of the Red Cross work; cut off all communication links between the DPRK and the ROK; freeze and removal of inter-Korean Kaesong Industrial Park, Office for Economic Cooperation Agreement, the immediate expulsion of all the South Korean local personnel; counter the South Korean authorities of "psychological war against the DPRK"; a total ban on South Korean vessels and aircraft by the DPRK's territorial waters and airspace; on the inter-Korean relations in all issues of "War Law" for processing.

The spokesman refuted Lee 24 on the "Tian An" alert No. sinking ship of the national speech. He said that Lee's speech is tantamount to waging war, confrontation with North Korea are less deserving of a formal declaration.

South Korea issued a joint mission on the 20th official investigation concluded that the March 26 "Tian An" alert No. sinking ship because of "the implementation of the Korean mini-submarine torpedo attack." DPRK National Defense Commission, refused to accept this conclusion, and verification of evidence required to send a delegation to Korea, but that request was rejected South Korea.

Lee, 24, made a speech on national require North Korea to "Tian" ship to apologize, said South Korea will ban North Korean ships to enter territorial waters, interruption of inter-Korean trade, cooperation and exchanges, and after consultation with the States concerned to submit The event has UN Security Council.

http://www.wholesalekey.net/edm/20100517edm/

We reveal why tech might decide the outcome of the election and the tech policies of the big three parties

Before politicians board their battle buses for this year’s General Election, there’s a new subject they’re going to have to rehearse sound bites for: technology. For the first time in British political history, subjects such as broadband, file-sharing and access to computers in the home are appearing on election manifestos.

While no-one is pretending that pre-election pledges on broadband speeds are likely to hold as much sway over voters as the faltering economic recovery, fiddled expenses, or Gordon Brown’s short fuse, the fact the major parties are even talking about technology is indicative of its potential significance at the ballot box.

Technology is a potential vote-winner in other ways too. The 2010 General Election will see the debut of social networking services such as Twitter and Facebook on the campaign trail, as MPs and candidates slip the spin doctors’ shackles and communicate directly with the electorate – risking everything on an unguarded comment that could make its way round the internet faster than the most rapacious virus.

Here we’re going to examine the digital policies of Britain’s three main political parties to help you decide who deserves an X on your ballot paper, and reveal what impact technology could have on the campaign itself. Prepare for Britain’s first General Techlection.

Tech front and centre

There’s no doubt that technology now pervades even the highest echelons of government. Since the last General Election in 2005, we’ve seen the appointment of two Ministers for Digital Britain, and the subsequent publication of the Digital Economy Bill. When even Lord Mandelson spends hour upon hour in the chamber debating the finer points of disconnecting illegal file-sharers, you know technology has splashed down in the political mainstream.

The parties also view issues such as broadband speeds as potential vote-swingers. A few months after the Government pledged to bring nationwide connections of 2Mbits/sec by 2012 and announced a £6 per year tax to pay for next-generation high-speed networks, the opposition went one further, promising to deliver nationwide 100Mbits/sec broadband by 2017.

In the same way as the parties use the number of bobbies on the beat and hospital beds as pre-election tempters, they’re now bandying around broadband speeds. “In the 19th century, we built the railways; in the 20th century, we built the motorways. In the 21st century, let’s build the superfast broadband network,” said shadow chancellor George Osborne, announcing the new policy on the BBC.

The internet is also the driving force behind a new political force: the UK branch of the Pirate Party, which counts reform of the copyright and patent law for the internet age among one of its three core policies. The Pirates plan to field up to ten candidates across the country, although party leader Andrew Robinson admits its target is modest.

“Our target is simple and realistic – to raise our profile,” he said. “We are well aware that we won’t storm to power in a first-past-the-post election, so we’re treating it as a learning experience, as well as the most cost-effective way there is to make the public aware of our existence and our policies.”

Election watchers are equally sceptical that technology policies are going to prove decisive for all but a slim minority of voters. “It isn’t something we’ve noticed coming up in our polls,” said Dr Roger Mortimer, head of political research at Ipsos Mori, echoing the views of fellow pollsters YouGov. “There are only two or three big issues that register with voters – things like the economy and crime,” Mortimer added, although he did concede that fringe issues such as technology could help sway an undecided voter.

Social vote-winning

If technology policies won’t be enough to shift the pendulum on the swingometer, technology itself might be. When Britain last went to the polls in May 2005, Facebook was still Mark Zuckerberg’s university project and Twitter hadn’t even been invented. Now, both are widely used by politicians to reach out directly to voters

http://www.wholesalekey.net/edm/20100517edm/